qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] MINGW: Unable to link multiboot.img + strnlen missing


From: Alexander Graf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] MINGW: Unable to link multiboot.img + strnlen missing
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:35:17 +0200


On 01.07.2009, at 15:24, Anthony Liguori wrote:

Bartlomiej Celary wrote:
Hi,
I have recently updated my git snapshot and had 2 problems:


Thanks for the report.

1. There is no strnlen function in MINGW (not sure if it has been
added recently as I might be using an outdated version...)


That should be easy enough to fix.  Can you send a patch?

2. I was not able to link multiboot.bin using mingw:

for d in pc-bios/optionrom; do \
make -C $d || exit 1 ; \
       done
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/abc024/work/qemu/pc-bios/ optionrom'
gcc -o signrom -g -Wall signrom.c
gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Werror -fomit-frame-pointer
-fno-builtin -I/home/abc024/work/qemu -o multiboot.o -c multiboot.S
ld --oformat binary -Ttext 0 -o multiboot.img multiboot.o
D:\mingw\bin\ld.exe: cannot perform PE operations on non PE output
file 'multiboot.img'.
make[1]: *** [multiboot.img] Error 1
rm multiboot.o
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/abc024/work/qemu/pc-bios/optionrom'
make: *** [roms] Error 1

And it looks that this workaround did the trick:

diff --git a/pc-bios/optionrom/Makefile b/pc-bios/optionrom/Makefile
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
index c4a6f42..f414eba
--- a/pc-bios/optionrom/Makefile
+++ b/pc-bios/optionrom/Makefile
@@ -34,8 +34,14 @@ build-all: multiboot.bin
%.o: %.S
       $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ -c $<

-%.img: %.o
-       $(LD) --oformat binary -Ttext 0 -o $@ $<
+%.img: %.out
+       $(OBJCOPY) -O binary -j .text $< $@
+
+%.out: %.o
+       $(LD) -Ttext 0 -e _start -s -o $@ $<

%.bin: %.img signrom
       ./signrom $< $@

Obviously objcopy needs to be defined in the config.mak file.


I'm not sure I understand why this works, but if you resubmit the patch with a Signed-off-by, we can apply it.

It's unfortunate that we need to do the signrom step now that I think about it as it's bad for cross-compilation. Maybe we should sign anything without a checksum when doing option rom loading. What do you think Alex?

Why can't we just exclude mingw from building option roms? Let's just treat it like any non-x86 platform, so it takes the binary blobs.

Alex





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]