qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv4 4/5] qemu/msi: missing braces


From: Blue Swirl
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv4 4/5] qemu/msi: missing braces
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 15:03:55 +0300

On 7/5/09, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 02:48:12PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
>  > On 7/5/09, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> wrote:
>  > > MSIX present bit is tested incorrectly, and only happens to work because
>  > >  the bit we are testing is 0x1.  Add braces to fix this.
>  > >
>  > >  Reported-by: Blue Swirl <address@hidden>
>  > >  Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
>  > >  ---
>  > >   hw/msix.c |    2 +-
>  > >   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>  > >
>  > >  diff --git a/hw/msix.c b/hw/msix.c
>  > >  index 33549f5..db72cc3 100644
>  > >  --- a/hw/msix.c
>  > >  +++ b/hw/msix.c
>  > >  @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ void msix_load(PCIDevice *dev, QEMUFile *f)
>  > >   {
>  > >      unsigned n = dev->msix_entries_nr;
>  > >
>  > >  -    if (!dev->cap_present & QEMU_PCI_CAP_MSIX)
>  > >  +    if (!(dev->cap_present & QEMU_PCI_CAP_MSIX))
>  >
>  > With the braces comment I meant that while working on the code, you
>  > should update it to match CODING_STYLE:
>  > if (!(dev->cap_present & QEMU_PCI_CAP_MSIX)) {
>  >     return;
>  > }
>
>
> Yea ... it's probably better to do this all over the file, not piecewise,
>  though. No?

I think it's better to do it together with other changes:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-05/msg00925.html




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]