qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Re: RTC polling mode broken


From: Gleb Natapov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Re: RTC polling mode broken
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:17:06 +0300

On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 03:08:19PM +0200, Bernhard Kauer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 03:33:30PM +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 01:18:03PM +0200, Bernhard Kauer wrote:
> > > Suppose I have some software that does not run with Qemu 
> > > and I have done the following steps:
> > > 
> > >   1. found that it is bug in Qemu and not in my software
> > >   2. produced a patch that fixed the problem for my test-case
> > >   3. send the patch with an explanation to the mailinglist
> > >   4. waited 6 weeks for comments or inclusion in Qemu
> > > 
> > > Now what should I do, to get the bug fixed?
> > > 
> > Resend the patch? (no need to what for 6 week to do that BTW)
> 
> How often?
> 
> 
Once a week till maintainers notice :)

> 
> > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:50:43PM +0200, Bernhard Kauer wrote:
> > > > The RTC emulation does not set the IRQ flags independent of the IRQ 
> > > > enable bits.
> > > > 
> > > > The original MC146818A datasheet from 1984 notes:
> > > >         "flag bits in Register C [...] are set independent of the
> > > >         state of the corresponding enable bits in Register B"
> > > > Similar sections can be found in newer documentation e.g. in rtc82885.
> > > > 
> > > > Qemu and Bochs set the IRQ flags only if they are enabled,
> > > > which breaks drivers polling on them.
> > > > 
> > > > The following patch corrects this for the update-ended-flag in Qemu 
> > > > only.
> > > > It currently does not fix the handling of the other flags.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Bernhard Kauer <address@hidden>
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/hw/mc146818rtc.c b/hw/mc146818rtc.c
> > > > index 2022548..2b040a7 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/mc146818rtc.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/mc146818rtc.c
> > > > @@ -421,9 +421,10 @@ static void rtc_update_second2(void *opaque)
> > > >      }
> > > >  
> > > >      /* update ended interrupt */
> > > > +    s->cmos_data[RTC_REG_C] |= REG_C_UF;
> > > >      if (s->cmos_data[RTC_REG_B] & REG_B_UIE) {
> > > > -        s->cmos_data[RTC_REG_C] |= 0x90;
> > > > -        rtc_irq_raise(s->irq);
> > > > +      s->cmos_data[RTC_REG_C] |= REG_C_IRQF;
> > > > +      rtc_irq_raise(s->irq);
> > > >      }
> > > >  
> > > >      /* clear update in progress bit */
> > > 
> 

--
                        Gleb.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]