|
From: | Anthony Liguori |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained? |
Date: | Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:31:14 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090825) |
Avi Kivity wrote:
For qemu.git I'd agree since it's undergoing a lot of churn. Unfortunately it also feeds qemu-kvm.git which I try very hard to keep regression-free (and finding and fixing regressions during a merge is quite horrible), so I'd really appreciate it if qemu.git quality didn't deteriorate.
Or more accurately, you'd prefer if there were no bugs in qemu so that you only had to deal with the bugs that were introduced in qemu-kvm.
That would be nice for you of course :-) But it's unrealistic to compare the two. $ git log --since='1 Month ago' --no-merges qemu-kvm/master --committer='Avi Kivity' --pretty=format:'%an' | wc -l
5$ git log --since='1 Month ago' --no-merges qemu-kvm/master --committer='Marcelo Tosatti' --pretty=format:'%an' | wc -l
5$ git log --since='1 Month ago' --no-merges origin/master --committer='Anthony Liguori' --pretty=format:'%an' | wc -l
251So there are going to be at least 25x more regressions introduced from upstream qemu than what are introduced in qemu-kvm.
(and we're quite far from catching every regression btw). Anthony, how long are your test cycles?
Depends on the number of regressions. I can usually get through testing in 4-5 hours when everything works. Everything usually doesn't work though.
Regards, Anthony Liguori
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |