qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qcow2: Bring synchronous read/write back to lif


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qcow2: Bring synchronous read/write back to life
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:47:00 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b3

Am 08.10.2009 16:30, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> When the synchronous read and write functions were dropped, they were 
>> replaced
>> by generic emulation functions. Unfortunately, these emulation functions 
>> don't
>> provide the same semantics as the original functions did.
>>
>> The original bdrv_read would mean that we read some data synchronously and 
>> that
>> we won't be interrupted during this read. The latter assumption is no longer
>> true with the emulation function which needs to use qemu_aio_poll and 
>> therefore
>> allows the callback of any other concurrent AIO request to be run during the
>> read.
> 
> Perhaps you could create a mechanism to freeze the qcow2 image by 
> queuing all completions within qcow2 until the image was unfrozen.  This 
> would have the same effect switching to synchronous read/write.
> 
> You may also have to queue new read/write requests...
> 
> Introducing sync read/write seems like a major step backwards to me.

Right, I was expecting your reaction. ;-) I do even agree that it's not
nice to have the synchronous functions back. But removing them caused a
regression, so the removal should be reverted until it is done right.

I just want to make clear that we're talking about data corruption here.
This is not just something that we can care about when we are bored some
time in the future.

For stable, I think taking this patch is the only reasonable thing to
do. Any other solution would be way too invasive. For master we can
discuss other solutions. However, I really don't feel like hacking
around it with a quick fix and breaking other stuff, so this takes a bit
more time. For the meantime I would prefer committing this to master, too.

By the way, I don't think queuing things in qcow2 is the right thing to
do. It probably wouldn't even help if, say, VMDK implemented AIO and I
used a VMDK image as a backing file for qcow2. The real solution is to
fix the generic bdrv_read/write emulation. Now we just need to find the
best way to do this.

Kevin




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]