[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM SMP support, early version
From: |
Jan Kiszka |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM SMP support, early version |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:17:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/30/2009 07:30 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> No. But what's wrong with on_vcpu?
>>>>
>>> intrinsically racy. signal passing slow down things, etc.
>>>
>>> That said, as I've stated many times: I don't believe there's anything
>>> fundamentally wrong with on_vcpu. But we might get benefits from a re-design
>>> of things to avoid it whenever possible. (just like the vcpu_reset()
>>> I've just posted)
>>>
>>>
>> If you don't want immediate execution of update_guest_debug, save the
>> state that shall be transferred, set some flag, and run the transfer
>> before guest entry inside the vcpu threads (after putting the registers
>> as older kernels may otherwise overwrite the flags register). Should
>> work, may even avoid redundant calls during a gdb session.
>>
>
> There's no guarantee the vcpu will ever exit to qemu, so you have to
> signal the vcpu thread anyway. When you do that, you might as well load
> the new state.
Debugging is special here as it involves vmstop before you start playing
with the debug settings. But I may also oversee some corner case right now.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux