[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] Re: Unclear committer situation
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] Re: Unclear committer situation |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Dec 2009 16:40:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 01:56:57PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> On 02.12.2009 20:12, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> >> I thought attaching a second copy were the way to send the patch
> >> properly.
> >>
> >
> > Attaching as an application/octet-stream is not terribly helpful. It
> > basically means you've attached a binary blob.
> >
> >> Is the proper way described somewhere?
> >>
> >
> > The proper way is to use a mailer that isn't broken. Attaching
> > everything as "application/octet-stream" is broken.
>
> Some mailers do the right thing if the attachment name ends in .txt
> (maybe that helps with gmail).
linux documentation suggests firefox extension ViewSourceWith.
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Unclear committer situation, (continued)
Re: [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation, Anthony Liguori, 2009/12/02
Re: [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation, Anthony Liguori, 2009/12/02
Re: [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation, Riku Voipio, 2009/12/03
Re: [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger, 2009/12/03
[Qemu-devel] Re: Unclear committer situation,
Michael S. Tsirkin <=
Re: [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation, Isaku Yamahata, 2009/12/04