qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: Endless loop in qcow2_alloc_cluster_offset


From: Jan Kiszka
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Endless loop in qcow2_alloc_cluster_offset
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:16:20 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>> Am 19.11.2009 13:19, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
>>> (gdb) print ((BDRVQcowState *)bs->opaque)->cluster_allocs.lh_first 
>>> $5 = (struct QCowL2Meta *) 0xcb3568
>>> (gdb) print *((BDRVQcowState *)bs->opaque)->cluster_allocs.lh_first 
>>> $6 = {offset = 7417176064, n_start = 0, nb_available = 16, nb_clusters = 0, 
>>> depends_on = 0xcb3568, dependent_requests = {lh_first = 0x0}, 
>>> next_in_flight = {le_next = 0xcb3568, le_prev = 0xc4ebd8}}
>>>
>>> So next == first.
>> Oops. Doesn't sound quite right...
>>
>>> Is something fiddling with cluster_allocs concurrently, e.g. some signal
>>> handler? Or what could cause this list corruption? Would it be enough to
>>> move to QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE?
>> Are there any specific signals you're thinking of? Related to block code
> 
> No, was just blind guessing.
> 
>> I can only think of SIGUSR2 and this one shouldn't call any block driver
>> functions directly. You're using aio=threads, I assume? (It's the default)
> 
> Yes, all on defaults.
> 
>> QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE shouldn't make a difference in this place as the loop
>> doesn't insert or remove any elements. If the list is corrupted now, I
>> think it would be corrupted with QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE as well - at best,
>> the endless loop would occur one call later.
>>
>> The only way I see to get such a loop in a list is to re-insert an
>> element that already is part of the list. The only insert is at
>> qcow2-cluster.c:777. Remains the question how we came there twice
>> without run_dependent_requests() removing the L2Meta from our list first
>> - because this is definitely wrong...
>>
>> Presumably, it's not reproducible?
> 
> Likely not. What I did was nothing special, and I did not noticed such a
> crash in the last months.

And now it happened again (qemu-kvm head, during kernel installation
from network onto local qcow2-disk). Any clever idea how to proceed with
this?

I could try to run the step in a loop, hopefully retriggering it once in
a (likely longer) while. But then we need some good instrumentation first.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]