qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: [SeaBIOS] [PATCH 0/8] option rom loading overhaul.


From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [SeaBIOS] [PATCH 0/8] option rom loading overhaul.
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:42:16 -0600
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090825)

Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 12/18/09 15:35, Anthony Liguori wrote:

I know this series carries a good bit of risk but I'd like to bring it
in 0.12.0. Because this has a guest visible change to the PCI devices,
we cannot carry it in stable-0.12 post release and I think the
functionality it brings it's very important.

The guest visible change automatically raises the question:
Do we need to do something for -M pc-0.11? Like loading the pci roms via fw_cfg too so the guest doesn't see the new pci rom bar?

Yes, we do. We can fix that problem as a stable-0.12 update though. Right now, migration with pc-0.11 is broken in other areas too.

Oh, and while thinking about compatibility issues: What about migration? I think we have to save rom_offset in case $pcidevice has a rom bar, otherwise your roms are gone after migration. Which you wouldn't notice until reboot though.

It's really unclear to me the best way to handle live migration. The rom_offset is not enough because unfortunately it's not stable after invocations of qemu. I think we're going to have to actually save the some contents with the PCIDevices.

For 0.13, we need to change the way that we migrate memory to fix this problem properly.

Is 0.11 -> 0.12 migration supposed to work? That could become quite nasty too. But maybe that is impossible anyway due to the switch to seabios?

In theory, it should work. SeaBIOS should not be a guest visible change because the guest should not depend on what BIOS we're using. While it's probably debatable about whether that's true, what's really important is whether it's actually functional. IOW, can we migrate, reboot Windows, and not have Windows freak out about the underlying machine changing.

If we can make the migration work, I suspect it won't be until 0.12.3 or 0.12.4.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]