[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] stable-0.12 versus master branching?
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] stable-0.12 versus master branching? |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:48:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
I am really confused wrt stable 0.12 branching policy.
For example I see this, in master:
commit d587e0787153f0224a6140c5015609963ceaabfb
Author: Anthony Liguori <address@hidden>
Date: Mon Dec 14 11:36:53 2009 -0600
Revert "pci: interrupt disable bit support"
This reverts commit 0ea5709a32085f7d14901a09d12bd35f9b267607.
Per discussion with Michael Tsirkin, this is too risky for 0.12
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <address@hidden>
(this was cherry-picked in stable-0.12 as well).
>From the comment, this revert makes sense for stable-0.12
but not for master. Is this an attempt to keep stable and master
as close as possible? I expected master development to proceed while
stable-0.12 would get just bugfixes. No?
Thanks,
--
MST
- [Qemu-devel] stable-0.12 versus master branching?,
Michael S. Tsirkin <=