qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Always swap endianness in DBDMA


From: Alexander Graf
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Always swap endianness in DBDMA
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:07:20 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)

Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:24:18AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>   
>> When we get an MMIO request, we always get variables in host endianness. The
>> only time we need to actually reverse byte order is when we read bytes from
>> guest memory.
>>
>> Apparently the DBDMA implementation is different there. A lot of the logic
>> in there depends on values being big endian. Now, qemu does all the 
>> conversion
>> in the MMIO handlers for us already though, so it turns out that we're in
>> the same byte order from a C point of view, but cpu_to_be32 and be32_to_cpu
>> end up being nops.
>>
>> This makes the code work differently on x86 (little endian) than on ppc (big
>> endian). On x86 it works, on ppc it doesn't.
>>
>> This patch (while being seriously hacky and ugly) makes dbdma emulation work
>> on ppc hosts. I'll leave the real fixing to someone else.
>>     
>
> Come on, 
>
> #define cpu_to_dbdma32 bswap32
> #define dbdma_to_cpu32 bswap32
>
> and then
>
> s/cpu_to_be32/cpu_to_dbdma32/g
> s/be32_to_cpu/dbdma32_to_cpu/g
>
> is not too hard, is it?
>   

Well, if I'd want to do a sed'ish approach I'd just

s/cpu_to_be32/bswap32/g
s/be32_to_cpu/bswap32/g

The problem is that the whole define is just plain wrong which tells me
that the code is using the bswap functions incorrectly. This really
needs to be fixed by someone who knows the dbdma device. I don't see how
calling incorrect calls even more incorrect makes any difference.

Alex




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]