qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] Clean-up a little bit the RW related


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] Clean-up a little bit the RW related bits of BDRV_O_FLAGS. BDRV_O_RDONLY gone (and so is BDRV_O_ACCESS). Default value for bdrv_flags (0/zero) is READ-ONLY. Need to explicitly request READ-WRITE.
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:25:32 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 01:09:29PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 08:26:56AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Jamie Lokier <address@hidden> writes:
> >> 
> >> > Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:34:59AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> >> > BDRV_O_RDWR is a flag, just like BDRV_SNAPSHOT.  We don't have
> >> >> > BDRV_DONT_SNAPSHOT, either.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Well, this just mirros the file access macros: we have RDONLY, WRONLY
> >> >> and RDRW. I assume this similarity is just historical?
> >> >
> >> > To avoid confusion, why don't we just call the flag BDRV_O_WRITABLE.
> >> > Then it's obvious what clearing that flag means.
> >> 
> >> Sounds good to me.
> >
> > Won't it be confused with WRONLY?
> 
> I doubt it.  "Writable" implies "write-only" no more than "readable"
> implies "read-only".

Yes :) But what I am saying is that the disk is readable as well.

-- 
MST




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]