|
| From: | Anthony Liguori |
| Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add definitions for current cpu models.. |
| Date: | Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:53:24 -0600 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-4.fc12 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 01/20/2010 02:26 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
To be honest all possible naming schemes for '-cpu<name>' are just as unfriendly as each other. The only user friendly option is '-cpu host'. IMHO, we should just pick a concise naming scheme& document it. Given they are all equally unfriendly, the one that has consistency with vmware naming seems like a mild winner.
IIUC, VMware uses "Group A, Group B", etc. which is pretty close to saying Family 10h IMHO.
Regards, Anthony Liguori
Daniel
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |