|
From: | Anthony Liguori |
Subject: | [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Jan 26 |
Date: | Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:22:46 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-4.fc12 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 01/26/2010 08:15 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/26/2010 04:13 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:Me too, especially as the whole stack is involved, and qemu is the topmost part from our perspective (no doubt libvirt will want to integrate that functionality as well).I'm not sure I agree. It would use no code from qemu and really benefit in no way from being part of qemu. I don't feel that strongly about it though.It would need to know which cpuid bits qemu supports. Only qemu knows that.
I'm not sure I understand why. Can you elaborate? Regards, Anthony Liguori
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |