qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Jan 26


From: Avi Kivity
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Jan 26
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:26:02 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.1

On 01/26/2010 04:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/26/2010 08:15 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/26/2010 04:13 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Me too, especially as the whole stack is involved, and qemu is the topmost part from our perspective (no doubt libvirt will want to integrate that functionality as well).


I'm not sure I agree. It would use no code from qemu and really benefit in no way from being part of qemu. I don't feel that strongly about it though.


It would need to know which cpuid bits qemu supports. Only qemu knows that.

I'm not sure I understand why.  Can you elaborate?


If qemu doesn't recognize -cpu qemu64,+nx, then no amount of hardware and kvm.ko support will allow the user to enable nx in a guest.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]