qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] PPC: Add wrapper for target long DCR operations


From: Aurelien Jarno
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] PPC: Add wrapper for target long DCR operations
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 17:15:26 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:04:25PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> On 14.01.2010, at 18:02, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 04:19:31PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> 
> >> On 14.01.2010, at 16:13, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >> 
> >>> On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 04:41:06PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>>> The recent transition to always have the DCR helper functions take 32 bit
> >>>> values broke the PPC64 target, as tlong became 64 bits there.
> >>>> 
> >>>> This patch moves all translate.c callers to a _tl function that simply
> >>>> calls the uint32_t functions. That way we don't need to mess with TCG
> >>>> trying to pass registers as uint32_t variables to functions.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Fixes PPC64 build with --enable-debug-tcg
> >>>> 
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <address@hidden>
> >>>> Reported-by: Stefan Weil <address@hidden>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> target-ppc/cpu.h       |    2 ++
> >>>> target-ppc/helper.h    |    4 ++--
> >>>> target-ppc/op_helper.c |   10 ++++++++++
> >>>> target-ppc/translate.c |   12 ++++++------
> >>>> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>>> 
> >>>> diff --git a/target-ppc/cpu.h b/target-ppc/cpu.h
> >>>> index d15bba1..60a8b68 100644
> >>>> --- a/target-ppc/cpu.h
> >>>> +++ b/target-ppc/cpu.h
> >>>> @@ -733,6 +733,8 @@ void ppc_store_slb (CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong 
> >>>> rb, target_ulong rs);
> >>>> void ppc_store_sr (CPUPPCState *env, int srnum, target_ulong value);
> >>>> #endif /* !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY) */
> >>>> void ppc_store_msr (CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong value);
> >>>> +void helper_store_dcr (uint32_t dcrn, uint32_t val);
> >>>> +uint32_t helper_load_dcr (uint32_t dcrn);
> >>>> 
> >>>> void ppc_cpu_list (FILE *f, int (*cpu_fprintf)(FILE *f, const char *fmt, 
> >>>> ...));
> >>>> 
> >>>> diff --git a/target-ppc/helper.h b/target-ppc/helper.h
> >>>> index 40d4ced..86f0af7 100644
> >>>> --- a/target-ppc/helper.h
> >>>> +++ b/target-ppc/helper.h
> >>>> @@ -359,8 +359,8 @@ DEF_HELPER_2(divo, tl, tl, tl)
> >>>> DEF_HELPER_2(divs, tl, tl, tl)
> >>>> DEF_HELPER_2(divso, tl, tl, tl)
> >>>> 
> >>>> -DEF_HELPER_1(load_dcr, i32, i32);
> >>>> -DEF_HELPER_2(store_dcr, void, i32, i32)
> >>>> +DEF_HELPER_1(load_dcr_tl, tl, tl);
> >>>> +DEF_HELPER_2(store_dcr_tl, void, tl, tl)
> >>>> 
> >>>> DEF_HELPER_1(load_dump_spr, void, i32)
> >>>> DEF_HELPER_1(store_dump_spr, void, i32)
> >>>> diff --git a/target-ppc/op_helper.c b/target-ppc/op_helper.c
> >>>> index cea27f2..6c375d3 100644
> >>>> --- a/target-ppc/op_helper.c
> >>>> +++ b/target-ppc/op_helper.c
> >>>> @@ -1844,6 +1844,11 @@ uint32_t helper_load_dcr (uint32_t dcrn)
> >>>>    return val;
> >>>> }
> >>>> 
> >>>> +target_ulong helper_load_dcr_tl (target_ulong dcrn)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +    return (uint32_t)helper_load_dcr((uint32_t)dcrn);
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> void helper_store_dcr (uint32_t dcrn, uint32_t val)
> >>>> {
> >>>>    if (unlikely(env->dcr_env == NULL)) {
> >>>> @@ -1857,6 +1862,11 @@ void helper_store_dcr (uint32_t dcrn, uint32_t 
> >>>> val)
> >>>>    }
> >>>> }
> >>>> 
> >>>> +void helper_store_dcr_tl (target_ulong dcrn, target_ulong val)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +    helper_store_dcr((uint32_t)dcrn, (uint32_t)val);
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>> 
> >>> I do wonder why we need to keep the old helper_load_dcr() and
> >>> helper_store_dcr() instead of modifying them directly. They doesn't seems
> >>> to be used elsewhere.
> >> 
> >> Last time I checked they were used in hw/*ppc*.c. Maybe mangled through 
> >> funny preprocessor or function callback logic. But maybe I'm wrong :).
> >> 
> > 
> > I am not able to find them. I have tried to remove helper_load_dcr() and
> > helper_store_dcr() from target-ppc/cpu.h and the code still compiles.
> 
> Hm, right. The only references are to ppc_dcr_read and ppc_dcr_write. I guess 
> the other helpers are superfluous then.
> 

I have applied a patch to fix the problem.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
address@hidden                 http://www.aurel32.net




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]