qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-kvm: Speed up of the dirty-bitmap-traveling


From: OHMURA Kei
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-kvm: Speed up of the dirty-bitmap-traveling
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:52:41 +0900
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)

dirty-bitmap-traveling is carried out by byte size in qemu-kvm.c.
But We think that dirty-bitmap-traveling by long size is faster than by byte
size especially when most of memory is not dirty.

Signed-off-by: OHMURA Kei <address@hidden>
---
 bswap.h    |    1 -
 qemu-kvm.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/bswap.h b/bswap.h
index 4558704..d896f01 100644
--- a/bswap.h
+++ b/bswap.h
@@ -209,7 +209,6 @@ static inline void cpu_to_be32wu(uint32_t *p, uint32_t v)
 #define cpu_to_32wu cpu_to_le32wu
 #endif
 
-#undef le_bswap
 #undef be_bswap
 #undef le_bswaps
 #undef be_bswaps
diff --git a/qemu-kvm.c b/qemu-kvm.c
index a305907..ea07912 100644
--- a/qemu-kvm.c
+++ b/qemu-kvm.c
@@ -2438,27 +2438,29 @@ static int kvm_get_dirty_pages_log_range(unsigned long 
start_addr,
                                          unsigned long offset,
                                          unsigned long mem_size)
 {
-    unsigned int i, j, n = 0;
-    unsigned char c;
-    unsigned long page_number, addr, addr1;
+    unsigned int i, j;
+    unsigned long page_number, addr, addr1, c;
     ram_addr_t ram_addr;
-    unsigned int len = ((mem_size / TARGET_PAGE_SIZE) + 7) / 8;
+    unsigned int len = ((mem_size / TARGET_PAGE_SIZE) + HOST_LONG_BITS - 1) /
+        HOST_LONG_BITS;
+    unsigned long *bitmap_ul = (unsigned long *)bitmap;
 
     /* 
      * bitmap-traveling is faster than memory-traveling (for addr...) 
      * especially when most of the memory is not dirty.
      */
     for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
-        c = bitmap[i];
-        while (c > 0) {
-            j = ffsl(c) - 1;
-            c &= ~(1u << j);
-            page_number = i * 8 + j;
-            addr1 = page_number * TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
-            addr = offset + addr1;
-            ram_addr = cpu_get_physical_page_desc(addr);
-            cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty(ram_addr);
-            n++;
+        if (bitmap_ul[i] != 0) {
+            c = le_bswap(bitmap_ul[i], HOST_LONG_BITS);
+            while (c > 0) {
+                j = ffsl(c) - 1;
+                c &= ~(1ul << j);
+                page_number = i * HOST_LONG_BITS + j;
+                addr1 = page_number * TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
+                addr = offset + addr1;
+                ram_addr = cpu_get_physical_page_desc(addr);
+                cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty(ram_addr);
+            }
         }
     }
     return 0;
-- 
1.6.3.3






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]