[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3]: BLOCK_WATERMARK QMP event
From: |
Luiz Capitulino |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3]: BLOCK_WATERMARK QMP event |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:18:48 -0300 |
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:03:14 -0600
Anthony Liguori <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 04:53 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This series is based on a previous series submitted by Uri Lublin:
> >
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-03/msg00864.html
> >
> > Details on the patches, except for this question: does it make sense to
> > have
> > a 'low' watermark for block devices?
> >
>
> Does it make sense to have a high watermark?
Yes, as it avoids polling :)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3]: BLOCK_WATERMARK QMP event, Luiz Capitulino, 2010/03/09
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] block-qcow2: keep highest allocated offset, Luiz Capitulino, 2010/03/09
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] monitor: Introduce block_watermark command, Luiz Capitulino, 2010/03/09
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] QMP: Introduce BLOCK_WATERMARK event, Luiz Capitulino, 2010/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3]: BLOCK_WATERMARK QMP event, Anthony Liguori, 2010/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3]: BLOCK_WATERMARK QMP event,
Luiz Capitulino <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3]: BLOCK_WATERMARK QMP event, Anthony Liguori, 2010/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3]: BLOCK_WATERMARK QMP event, Anthony Liguori, 2010/03/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3]: BLOCK_WATERMARK QMP event, Kevin Wolf, 2010/03/10