[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Mar 23
From: |
Zhang, Xiantao |
Subject: |
RE: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Mar 23 |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:31:53 +0800 |
Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 03/23/10 13:45, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> I don't think we can pull in:
>>
>> - extboot
>> - ia64
>> - in-kernel pit[1]
>> - associated command line options
>> - device passthrough
>>
>> The question is, if we dropped those things, would people actually
>> use qemu.git instead of qemu-kvm.git. If the answer is "no", what
>> set of things do we need in order for people to focus on qemu.git
>> instead of qemu-kvm.git.
>
> I am not sure if anyone is still actively working on ia64. According
> to the qemu-kvm.git logs, there hasn't been any real ia64 changes to
> the code since my last commit in June of last year and then a couple
> of minor configure bits.
>
> IMHO we can just let it rot - not sure if Xiantao is still interested?
For ia64 part, maybe we can keep the current qemu-kvm.git for the users. And it
is not a must to push it into Qemu upstream.
Xiantao
- [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Mar 23, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Mar 23, Anthony Liguori, 2010/03/23
- [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Mar 23, Avi Kivity, 2010/03/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Mar 23, Jes Sorensen, 2010/03/23
- RE: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Mar 23,
Zhang, Xiantao <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Mar 23, Jan Kiszka, 2010/03/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Mar 23, Jes Sorensen, 2010/03/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Mar 23, Chris Wright, 2010/03/26
[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Mar 23, Anthony Liguori, 2010/03/23