qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RESEND] Serial: DOS Plus regression


From: Roy Tam
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH][RESEND] Serial: DOS Plus regression
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 07:38:15 +0800

2010/3/27 Aurelien Jarno <address@hidden>:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 08:58:13PM +0800, Roy Tam wrote:
>> The commit in r1049 (serial interrupt fix (Hampa Hug)) prevents
>> booting Digital Research DOSPlus. Following patch partially reverts
>> that commit and makes DOSPlus booting in QEMU again.
>
> I guess that this patch has been introduced to fix an issue. Are you
> sure your partial revert is correct and is not going to create a
> regression? What the documentation says?

In other words, I can't find other implementations (such as Bochs)
checks LSR_THRE in IER. And the log message in r1049 doesn't say any
regressions too. As a result I assume checking LSR_THRE in IER in
r1049 is wrong implementation. Partial reverting r1049 are tested and
no regression created(tested with DOS/Windows/*nix guests, if they
work correctly before applying this patch).

>
>> Sign-off-by: Roy Tam <address@hidden>
>>
>> --
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/serial.c b/hw/serial.c
>> index f3ec36a..2ae550e 100644
>> --- a/hw/serial.c
>> +++ b/hw/serial.c
>> @@ -401,10 +401,6 @@ static void serial_ioport_write(void *opaque,
>>                       s->poll_msl = 0;
>>                  }
>>              }
>> -            if (s->lsr & UART_LSR_THRE) {
>> -                s->thr_ipending = 1;
>> -                serial_update_irq(s);
>> -            }
>>          }
>>          break;
>>      case 2:
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
> address@hidden                 http://www.aurel32.net
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]