Re: [Qemu-devel] How to lock-up your tap-based VM network

[Jan Kiszka]

Paul Brook wrote:
>> But anyway, this flow control mechanism is buggy - what if instead of
>> an interface down, you just have a *slow* guest?  That should not push
>> back so much that it makes other guests networking with each other
>> slow down.
> 
> The OP described multiple guests connected via a host bridge. In this case it 
> is entirely the host's responsibility to arbitrate between multiple guests. 
> If 
> one interface can block the bridge simply by failing to respond in a timely 
> manner then this is a serious bug or misconfiguration of your host bridge.

It's not the bridge, I think it's limited to the tun driver as bridge
participant and how it is configured/used by QEMU.

> 
> The reason tap_send exists is because slirp does not implement TCP flow 
> control properly.  Instead it relies on the can_send hook to only avoid 
> dropped packets.
> 
> Using this in the tap code is debatable. My guess is that this is a hack to 
> workaround guest network stacks that expect throughput to be limited by line 
> speed (which is a virtual environment is effectively infinite), have poor 
> higher level flow control, and react badly to packet loss.

[ CC'ing some people who should have been involved in establishing the
TX mitigation for tap devices. Full thread under
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/67809 ]

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux