qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, resend] [STABLE] Sync OSS_GETVERSION handling w


From: Juergen Lock
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, resend] [STABLE] Sync OSS_GETVERSION handling with head
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 23:52:16 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:38:34PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:16:46PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:52:22PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 06:17:32PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > > > As suggested by Andreas Färber, here is a cumulative patch that syncs
> > > > OSS_GETVERSION handling with head by merging the following commits:
> > > > 
> > > > 1. oss: issue OSS_GETVERSION ioctl only when needed
> > > >    6d246526ce3c145b2831285def6983f5de6190d3
> > > > 
> > > > 2. oss: fix fragment setting
> > > >    3d709fe73a77c40e263b3af6e650fd4b519c3562
> > > > 
> > > > 3. Workaround for broken OSS_GETVERSION on FreeBSD, part two
> > > >    72ff25e4e98d6dba9286d032b9ff5432553bbad5
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Juergen Lock <address@hidden>
> > > 
> > > I would actually prefer a patch series instead of a cumulative patch, so
> > > that we can match commits between HEAD and stable-0.12.
> > > 
> > Oh, I only did what was suggested...  If you want to merge those as
> > individual commits I think you can just cherry-pick them from head?
> > 
> 
> They doesn't apply directly, and fixing them doesn't seems that
> trivial.

Oh, I must have completely forgot about that then. :(  I'll see what
I can do over the next few days...

 Cheers,
        Juergen




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]