qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] Add support for execution from ROMs in IO d


From: Jan Kiszka
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] Add support for execution from ROMs in IO device mode
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 22:24:03 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Jamie Lokier wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> While IO_MEM_ROMD marks an I/O memory region as "read/execute from RAM,
>>> but write to I/O handler", there is no flag indicating that an I/O
>>> region which is fully managed by I/O handlers can still be hosting
>>> executable code. One use case for this are flash device models that
>>> switch to I/O mode during reprogramming. Not all reprogramming states
>>> modify to read data, thus practically allow to continue execution.
>>> Moreover, we need to avoid switching the modes too frequently for
>>> performance reasons which requires fetching opcodes while still in I/O
>>> device mode.
>> I like this change.
>>
>> Does "fetching opcodes while still in I/O device mode" fetch opcodes
>> from the RAM backing, or via the I/O read handlers?
> 
> Via the latter. This is most "correct" in that broken guests that jump
> to the ROM while it's in some critical write cycle will properly crash.
> 
>> If the latter, I'm wondering how KVM would cope with that.
> 
> I think it won't work without extending KVM to fetch - as a last resort
> - also from I/O devices. Or we give up the "correctness" and keep the
> RAM-base KVM slot for IO_MEM_EXEC regions. That should be solvable in a
> transparent way in kvm_set_phys_mem.

Which, of course, would break CFI reads etc. for KVM guest. So this
feature actually requires additional support by KVM to fetch code from
I/O devices.

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]