qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Add cache=volatile parameter to -drive


From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Add cache=volatile parameter to -drive
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 08:26:38 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-4.fc12 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0

On 05/17/2010 08:17 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 17.05.2010, at 15:09, Anthony Liguori wrote:

On 05/17/2010 08:02 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
My concern is that ext3 exaggerates the cost of fsync() which will result in 
diminishing value over time for this feature as people move to ext4/btrfs.

There will be ext3 file systems for years out. Just because people can use 
better and faster file systems doesn't mean they do. And I'm sure they can't 
always choose. If anything, I can try and see what the numbers look like for 
xfs.

But ext3 with barrier=1 is pretty uncommon in practice.  Another data point 
would be an ext3 host file system with barrier=0.
Who defines what is common and what not? To me, the SLES11 default is common. 
In fact, the numbers in the referred mail were done on an 11.1 system.

But it wasn't the SLES10 default so there's a smaller window of systems that are going to be configured this way. But this is orthogonal to the main point. Let's quantify how important this detail is before we discuss the affected user base.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Alex





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]