qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/22] machine: make max_cpus a -machine option


From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/22] machine: make max_cpus a -machine option
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:56:38 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4

On 06/07/2010 08:01 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
diff --git a/hw/realview.c b/hw/realview.c
index a36bdbe..8dcef80 100644
--- a/hw/realview.c
+++ b/hw/realview.c
@@ -444,9 +444,9 @@ static QEMUMachine realview_eb_mpcore_machine = {
      .init = realview_eb_mpcore_init,
      .opts_default = (QemuOptValue[]) {
          QOPT_VALUE("default_drive", "scsi"),
+        QOPT_VALUE("max_cpus", "4"),
          { /* end of list */ }
      },
-    .max_cpus = 4,
  };
By my reading this allows the user to modify this value. If so it is wrong.

max_cpus is complicated because it was used for multiple purposes.

I think max_cpus ought to be configurable. The reason it's useful to configure it that it lets a downstream specify a recommended max cpu that's mostly relevant from a scalability perspective. For instance, you may want to set the pc max_cpus to 64 since this is the highest that KVM supports today.

This is a fundamental property/limitation of the hardware. Expect qemu to
crash if the value is modified.

In this case, the machine cores should be rejecting totally invalid values to prevent crashes from occurring. My reading of realview does not suggest that a crash would occur. Are you speaking in general terms or do you think it will actually fail in realview?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori


Paul





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]