qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/6] RAMBlock: Add a name field


From: Paul Brook
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/6] RAMBlock: Add a name field
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 13:18:47 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.33-2-amd64; KDE/4.4.3; x86_64; ; )

> > > Not all ram is associated with a device.
> > 
> > Maybe not, but where it is we should be using that information.
> > Absolute minimum we should be using the existing qdev address rather than
> > inventing a new one.  Duplicating this logic inside every device seems
> > like a bad idea so I suggest identifying ram blocks by a (name, device)
> > pair. For now we can allow a NULL device for system memory.
> 
> I'm not sure if this is what you're after, but what if we change it to
> something like:
> 
> +    snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s.%02x.%x.rom-%s",
> +             pdev->bus->qbus.name, PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn),
> +             PCI_FUNC(pdev->devfn), pdev->qdev.info->name);
> 
> This gives us things like "pci.0.03.0.rom-rtl8139".  For pci-assign, we
> can expand on the host details, such as:
> ..
> Giving us "pci.0.04.0.bar0-pci-assign(0000:01:10.0)".  Anywhere closer?

Not really.  This identifier is device and bus independent, which is why I 
suggested passing the device to qemu_ram_alloc.  This can then figure out how 
to the identify the device. It should probably do this the same way that we 
identify the saved state for the device.  Currently I think this is an 
arbitrary vmstate name/id, but I expect this to change to a qdev address
(e.g. /i440FX-pcihost/pci.0/_addr_04.0").

Paul



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]