qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] [scsi-bus]: Add PR-OUT and PR-IN case f


From: Nicholas A. Bellinger
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] [scsi-bus]: Add PR-OUT and PR-IN case for SCSIRequest xfer and xfer_mode setup
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 06:03:19 -0700

On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 14:13 +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 04.06.2010 16:06, schrieb Kevin Wolf:
> > Am 31.05.2010 03:43, schrieb Nicholas A. Bellinger:
> >> From: Nicholas Bellinger <address@hidden>
> >>
> >> This patch updates hw/scsi-bus.c to add PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT and 
> >> PERSISTENT_RESERVE_IN
> >> case in scsi_req_length() to extra the incoming buffer length into 
> >> SCSIRequest->cmd.xfer,
> >> and adds a second PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT case in scsi_req_xfer_mode() in 
> >> order to properly
> >> set SCSI_XFER_TO_DEV for WRITE data.
> >>
> >> Tested with Linux KVM guests and Megasas 8708EM2 HBA emulation and 
> >> TCM_Loop target ports.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >>  hw/scsi-bus.c |    5 +++++
> >>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/scsi-bus.c b/hw/scsi-bus.c
> >> index b8e4b71..75ec74e 100644
> >> --- a/hw/scsi-bus.c
> >> +++ b/hw/scsi-bus.c
> >> @@ -325,6 +325,10 @@ static int scsi_req_length(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t 
> >> *cmd)
> >>      case INQUIRY:
> >>          req->cmd.xfer = cmd[4] | (cmd[3] << 8);
> >>          break;
> >> +    case PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT:
> >> +    case PERSISTENT_RESERVE_IN:
> >> +        req->cmd.xfer = cmd[8] | (cmd[7] << 8);
> > 
> > Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't exactly the same value set in the
> > switch block above? (for cmd[0] >> 5 == 2)
> 
> Nicholas? This isn't applied yet because I'm waiting for your answer.
> 
> Is there a reason why it makes sense to do it explicitly here instead
> using the generic code a few lines above? I think the same applied to
> patch 2/2.

Hi Kevin,

I just tested this again and you are correct, the reassignment of
req->cmd.xfer for PR and Maintence CDBs is unnecessary in
scsi_req_length().  I will go ahead and drop part this from my tree.

Please let me know if you would like me to resend the patch series.

Best,

--nab




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]