qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] blockdev.h: Add GCC attribute (check format


From: malc
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] blockdev.h: Add GCC attribute (check format arguments)
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:02:50 +0400 (MSD)
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23)

On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Stefan Weil wrote:

> Am 01.07.2010 22:10, schrieb Blue Swirl:
> > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Stefan Weil <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > >  blockdev.h |    3 ++-
> > >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/blockdev.h b/blockdev.h
> > > index 23ea576..3c5c85d 100644
> > > --- a/blockdev.h
> > > +++ b/blockdev.h
> > > @@ -42,7 +42,8 @@ extern int drive_get_max_bus(BlockInterfaceType type);
> > >  extern void drive_uninit(DriveInfo *dinfo);
> > >  extern const char *drive_get_serial(BlockDriverState *bdrv);
> > > 
> > > -extern QemuOpts *drive_add(const char *file, const char *fmt, ...);
> > > +extern QemuOpts *drive_add(const char *file, const char *fmt, ...)
> > > +    __attribute__ ((__format__ (__printf__, 2, 3)));
> > >  extern DriveInfo *drive_init(QemuOpts *arg, int default_to_scsi,
> > >                              int *fatal_error);
> > 
> > I lost the cover letter, so this applies to all patches: Wouldn't it
> > make sense to make GCC_FMT_ATTR(n, m) from audio/audio_int.h available
> > universally and then use that?
> 
> 
> That's a matter of personal taste:
> 
> GCC_FMT_ATTR(n, m) is shorter, but a human reader has to
> look it up once to see what it does (ok, some readers might
> guess it right). The compiler has to look it up, too, so
> a common header file is needed.
> 
> When I prepared the patches, I did not notice that some
> functions used GCC_FMT_ATTR. I added the __attribute__
> macro to these functions and got a compiler error...
> This shows that at least for me GCC_FMT_ATTR was confusing
> (of course it no longer is).
> 
> Some people prefer GCC_FMT_ATTR because they want to
> be able to redefine it for non-gcc compilers.
> 
> __attribute__ can also be redefined for that case, so that
> is not a very strong argument.

Just to be pedantic, you can _not_ redfined __attribute the
name is reserved..

> 
> I prefer using __attribute__ without intermediate macro,
> but don't mind if a different style is preferred for qemu.
> 
> Regards
> Stefan
> 
> 

-- 
mailto:address@hidden



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]