qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/5] HACKING: add preprocessor rules


From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/5] HACKING: add preprocessor rules
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 13:32:31 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.6

On 08/16/2010 01:05 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Andreas Schwab<address@hidden>  wrote:
Blue Swirl<address@hidden>  writes:

+For variadic macros, stick with C99 syntax:
+
+#define DPRINTF(fmt, ...)                                       \
+    do { printf("IRQ: " fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
That's not C99 syntax, the combination with ## is a gcc extension.  In
C99 you cannot have an empty __VA_ARGS__.
That's too bad, I picked the example from one of our current macros.
Maybe just s/C99/this/ or perhaps we shouldn't specify any
non-standard syntax.

We definitely should discourage the GCC syntax [#define fn(arg...)] as it's deprecated by the new C99 syntax. Very specifically, only the '##' is an extension and it's a widely adopted one.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]