[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments
From: |
Kevin Wolf |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:33:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100720 Fedora/3.0.6-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.6 |
Am 22.08.2010 20:42, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 08/22/2010 01:36 PM, malc wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> But how would you do that? Drop the CODING_STYLE (and accept
>>>>> anything)? Switch to a new CODING_STYLE that is widely appreciated and
>>>>> so all bikeshedding will cease? Enforce current style?
>>>>>
>>>> I would suggest we either clean up the existing rule, or switch to the
>>>> Linux kernel style, with the explicit exemption that existing code can
>>>> keep the 4-char indentation, unless the whole file is converted. I'd
>>>> like to avoid a total reformatting of the codebase, but we could look at
>>>> it on a file by file base if it becomes relevant.
>>>>
>>> Sounds reasonable.
>>>
>>>
>> Doesn't to me.
>>
>
> I'm strongly opposed to any reformatting of the tree.
>
> All it does is break git blame which makes debugging harder without
> offering any real benefits.
Thanks, Anthony. I fully agree. (And Avi added another good reason.)
And while I'm posting my hopefully only post to this thread, let me
mention that I'm fine with our current CODING_STYLE and can't see a
reason for another switch.
Kevin
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, Jes Sorensen, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, malc, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, Blue Swirl, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, malc, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, Jes Sorensen, 2010/08/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, john cooper, 2010/08/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, Blue Swirl, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, malc, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, Anthony Liguori, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, Avi Kivity, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments,
Kevin Wolf <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, Jes Sorensen, 2010/08/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, Markus Armbruster, 2010/08/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, Anthony Liguori, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, Blue Swirl, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, Anthony Liguori, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, Blue Swirl, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, malc, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, Blue Swirl, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, malc, 2010/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] CODING_STYLE amendments, Avi Kivity, 2010/08/22