|
| From: | Avi Kivity |
| Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC][STABLE 0.13] Revert "qcow2: Use bdrv_(p)write_sync for metadata writes" |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:18:05 +0300 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100720 Fedora/3.1.1-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.1.1 |
On 08/24/2010 03:12 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Well, safety is not boolean. Considering to make it mostly safe instead of completely safe because of the performance doesn't mean that we should make it completely unsafe.What is safety then? A vague feeling of "oh today is monday so my data is safe, but on tuesday I always lose my image data"? Either we promise to keep data safe or we don't. There is no in between.
Do you drive a car? Though in general I agree we shouldn't compromise on data integrity. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |