|
| From: | Alexander Graf |
| Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC][STABLE 0.13] Revert "qcow2: Use bdrv_(p)write_sync for metadata writes" |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:21:11 +0200 |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) |
Avi Kivity wrote: > On 08/24/2010 03:12 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >>> Well, safety is not boolean. Considering to make it mostly safe instead >>> of completely safe because of the performance doesn't mean that we >>> should make it completely unsafe. >>> >> What is safety then? A vague feeling of "oh today is monday so my data >> is safe, but on tuesday I always lose my image data"? Either we promise >> to keep data safe or we don't. There is no in between. >> > > Do you drive a car? Would you buy a car where the breaks are known to not always work? ;) > Though in general I agree we shouldn't compromise on data integrity. That's my point. Either we go for it or we don't. Alex
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |