On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 04:23:38PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/25/2010 03:46 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
If we had another disk format that only supported growth and metadata
for a backing file, can you think of another failure scenario?
btw, only supporting growth is a step backwards. Currently file-backed
disks keep growing even the guest-used storage doesn't grow, since once
we allocate something we never release it. But eventually guests will
start using TRIM or DISCARD or however it's called, and then we can
expose it and reclaim unused blocks.
Together with file level snapshots Thin Provisioning support basically
makes qcow2 obsolete.
I already have a prototype implementation of scsi discard for qemu,
which together with the XFS extent size hints allows us to very
efficiently using growing and shrinking images on the bare filesystem.
XFS at this point doesn't have file-level snapshots, but I'm planning
to port the hole punhing and extent size hints to btrfs and maybe
ocfs2 which will give you all that.