qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 04/14] Zero initialize timespec struct explicitl


From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 04/14] Zero initialize timespec struct explicitly
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:43:26 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.6

On 08/30/2010 10:35 AM, address@hidden wrote:
From: Jes Sorensen<address@hidden>

Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen<address@hidden>
---
  linux-aio.c |    2 +-
  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/linux-aio.c b/linux-aio.c
index 68f4b3d..3240996 100644
--- a/linux-aio.c
+++ b/linux-aio.c
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static void qemu_laio_completion_cb(void *opaque)
          struct io_event events[MAX_EVENTS];
          uint64_t val;
          ssize_t ret;
-        struct timespec ts = { 0 };
+        struct timespec ts = { 0, 0 };

I don't like these. What's wrong with { } or { 0 }? Implicit zeroing of members is a critical feature of structure initialization so if there is something wrong with this, it's important to know why because otherwise we've got a massive amount of broken code.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

          int nevents, i;

          do {




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]