qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 5/5] RFC: distinguish warm reset from cold r


From: Avi Kivity
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 5/5] RFC: distinguish warm reset from cold reset.
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:29:43 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100806 Fedora/3.1.2-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.1.2

 On 08/31/2010 04:26 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 08/31/2010 08:21 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:20:51AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 08/31/2010 08:14 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
System_reset should do cold reset like it does now.
Why?

Because I should not be forced to restart qemu to bring devices to
initial state.

IOW, you use system_reset for debugging purposes to reset the device model.

Point taken but functionally speaking, system_reset should map to a RESET signal and from what I can tell in this thread, that's a warm reset.


Note, for most devices there's no difference. x86 has INIT and RESET, with the keyboard controller RESET signal sometimes wired to INIT, and RAM doesn't have RESET. Otherwise most devices don't see a difference.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]