[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 07/11] kvm, x86: unify sigbus handling, pre
From: |
Marcelo Tosatti |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 07/11] kvm, x86: unify sigbus handling, prep |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:46:50 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) |
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:29:25AM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> (2010/10/15 9:36), Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 05:49:43PM +0900, Jin Dongming wrote:
> >> There are 2 similar functions to handle SIGBUS:
> >> sigbus_handler(int n, struct qemu_signalfd_siginfo *siginfo,
> >> void *ctx)
> >> kvm_on_sigbus(CPUState *env, siginfo_t *siginfo)
> >>
> >> The former is used when main thread receives SIGBUS via signalfd,
> >> while latter is used when vcpu thread receives SIGBUS.
> >> These 2 take different siginfo, but in both case required parameters
> >> are common, the code and the addr in the info.
> >>
> >> Restruct functions to take the code and the addr explicitly.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hidetoshi Seto <address@hidden>
> >> Tested-by: Jin Dongming <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >> qemu-kvm.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> >> 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > Don't see the benefit, separate functions are cleaner.
>
> I think this is good for maintainability.
> If you want to fix a bug in this area, you might have to change
> 2 separate functions in completely same way.
> See 6c85786 and a05684e for examples.
>
> Thanks,
> H.Seto
OK, makes sense. Do you mind to rebase your patchset after MCE support is
merged in qemu
upstream?