|
From: | Anthony Liguori |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19 |
Date: | Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:33:33 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.8 |
On 10/19/2010 08:27 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 10/19/2010 03:22 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:I had assumed that this would involve: qemu -hda windows.img (qemu) snapshot ide0-disk0 snap0.img1) create snap0.img internally by doing the equivalent of `qemu-img create -f qcow2 -b windows.img snap0.img'2) bdrv_flush('ide0-disk0') 3) bdrv_open(snap0.img) 4) bdrv_close(windows.img) 5) rename('windows.img', 'windows.img.tmp') 6) rename('snap0.img', 'windows.img') 7) rename('windows.img.tmp', 'snap0.img')Looks reasonable.Would be interesting to look at this as a use case for the threading work. We should eventually be able to create a snapshot without stalling vcpus (stalling I/O of course allowed).
If we had another block-level command, like bdrv_aio_freeze(), that queued all pending requests until the given callback completed, it would be very easy to do this entirely asynchronously. For instance:
bdrv_aio_freeze(create_snapshot) create_snapshot(): bdrv_aio_flush(done_flush) done_flush(): bdrv_open(...) bdrv_close(...) ...Of course, closing a device while it's being frozen is probably a recipe for disaster but you get the idea :-)
Regards, Anthony Liguori
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |