qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: bonito: PCI_STATUS questions


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: bonito: PCI_STATUS questions
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 10:16:26 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 04:31:33PM +0800, chen huacai wrote:
> Please see bonito64_pcibios_config_access() in
> arch/mips/pci/ops-bonito64.c of Linux kernel code.
> You will find something useful.


Thanks!
I found this:

        /* Clear aborts */
        BONITO_PCICMD |= BONITO_PCICMD_MABORT_CLR | BONITO_PCICMD_MTABORT_CLR;

        BONITO_PCIMAP_CFG = (addr >> 16) | type;

        /* Flush Bonito register block */
        dummy = BONITO_PCIMAP_CFG;
        mmiowb();

        addrp = CFG_SPACE_REG(addr & 0xffff);
        if (access_type == PCI_ACCESS_WRITE) {
                writel(cpu_to_le32(*data), addrp);
                /* Wait till done */
                while (BONITO_PCIMSTAT & 0xF);
        } else {
                *data = le32_to_cpu(readl(addrp));
        }

        /* Detect Master/Target abort */
        if (BONITO_PCICMD & (BONITO_PCICMD_MABORT_CLR |
                             BONITO_PCICMD_MTABORT_CLR)) {
                /* Error occurred */

                /* Clear bits */
                BONITO_PCICMD |= (BONITO_PCICMD_MABORT_CLR |
                                  BONITO_PCICMD_MTABORT_CLR);

                return -1;
        }

So it looks like guest will clear bits, perform a transaction
then check error bits. In other words, it looks like it
assumes that writing 1 to these bits will clear them.
Correct?

> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 08:57:01AM +0800, chen huacai wrote:
> >> Because the code in PMON and Linux kernel use these bits to verify r/w
> >> operations. If one of them is 1 after r/w, PMON and Linux will
> >> consider r/w has failed.
> >
> > Where's that code in Linux?
> >
> >> I guess that software will not set them to 1, because it is set by
> >> hardware when operation fails.
> >
> > So I guess just making these write 1 to clear according to spec will work?
> >
> >> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> 
> >> wrote:
> >> > I see code in bonito.c that clears bits:
> >> > PCI_STATUS_REC_MASTER_ABORT | PCI_STATUS_REC_TARGET_ABORT
> >> > on each read and write.
> >> >
> >> > However
> >> > 1. I don't see anything in code that would set these bits
> >> > 2. The PCI spec says this about the status register:
> >> >
> >> >        Reads to this register behave normally. Writes are slightly 
> >> > different in
> >> >        that bits can be reset, but not set. A one bit is reset (if it is 
> >> > not
> >> >        read-only) whenever the register is written, and the write data 
> >> > in the
> >> >        corresponding bit location is a 1. For instance, to clear bit 14 
> >> > and not
> >> >        affect any other bits, write the value 0100_0000_0000_0000b to the
> >> >        register.
> >> >
> >> > while the code in bonito.c resets the bits to 0 on each write.
> >> >
> >> > Comments?
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > MST
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Huacai Chen
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Huacai Chen



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]