[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/3] Fail if detecting an unknown option

[Jes Sorensen]

On 12/06/10 10:37, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 06.12.2010 09:02, schrieb Jes Sorensen:
>> On 12/03/10 13:30, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> There is a perfectly logical explanation for that. Doing that would
>> require for me to have clue, which is a bit much to expect :)
>>
>> That said, we should really do the same for the c == -1 case as well.
> 
> That's what I thought at first, too. But then the break relates to the
> switch instead of the for, so it would have to become a goto to a new
> label. Probably not a big improvement...

Yeah, it hit me the moment I hit send, so ignore that comment.

Cheers,
Jes