Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] PCI: Bus number from the bridge, not the device

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:04:24PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 06:57 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 09:49:21PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-12-14 at 06:46 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 01:04:23PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 13:22 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:53:11PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > > > > pcibus_dev_print() was erroneously retrieving the device bus
> > > > > > > number from the secondary bus number offset of the device
> > > > > > > instead of the bridge above the device.  This ends of landing
> > > > > > > in the 2nd byte of the 3rd BAR for devices, which thankfully
> > > > > > > is usually zero.  pcibus_get_dev_path() copied this code,
> > > > > > > inheriting the same bug.  pcibus_get_dev_path() is used for
> > > > > > > ramblock naming, so changing it can effect migration.  However,
> > > > > > > I've only seen this byte be non-zero for an assigned device,
> > > > > > > which can't migrate anyway, so hopefully we won't run into
> > > > > > > any issues.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <address@hidden>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Good catch. Applied.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Um... submitted vs applied:
> > > > > 
> > > > >      PCI: Bus number from the bridge, not the device
> > > > >  
> > > > > @@ -6,20 +8,28 @@
> > > > >      number from the secondary bus number offset of the device
> > > > >      instead of the bridge above the device.  This ends of landing
> > > > >      in the 2nd byte of the 3rd BAR for devices, which thankfully
> > > > > -    is usually zero.  pcibus_get_dev_path() copied this code,
> > > > > +    is usually zero.
> > > > > +    
> > > > > +    Note: pcibus_get_dev_path() copied this code,
> > > > >      inheriting the same bug.  pcibus_get_dev_path() is used for
> > > > >      ramblock naming, so changing it can effect migration.  However,
> > > > >      I've only seen this byte be non-zero for an assigned device,
> > > > >      which can't migrate anyway, so hopefully we won't run into
> > > > >      any issues.
> > > > >  
> > > > > +    This patch does not touch pcibus_get_dev_path, as
> > > > > +    bus number is guest assigned for nested buses,
> > > > > +    so using it for migration is broken anyway.
> > > > > +    Fix it properly later.
> > > > > +    
> > > > >      Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <address@hidden>
> > > > > +    Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden>
> > > > >  
> > > > >  diff --git a/hw/pci.c b/hw/pci.c
> > > > > -index 6d0934d..15416dd 100644
> > > > > +index 962886e..8f6fcf8 100644
> > > > >  --- a/hw/pci.c
> > > > >  +++ b/hw/pci.c
> > > > > -@@ -1940,8 +1940,7 @@ static void pcibus_dev_print(Monitor *mon, 
> > > > > DeviceState *dev, int indent)
> > > > > +@@ -1806,8 +1806,7 @@ static void pcibus_dev_print(Monitor *mon, 
> > > > > DeviceState *dev, int indent)
> > > > >   
> > > > >       monitor_printf(mon, "%*sclass %s, addr %02x:%02x.%x, "
> > > > >                      "pci id %04x:%04x (sub %04x:%04x)\n",
> > > > > @@ -29,14 +39,3 @@
> > > > >                      PCI_SLOT(d->devfn), PCI_FUNC(d->devfn),
> > > > >                      pci_get_word(d->config + PCI_VENDOR_ID),
> > > > >                      pci_get_word(d->config + PCI_DEVICE_ID),
> > > > > -@@ -1965,7 +1964,7 @@ static char *pcibus_get_dev_path(DeviceState 
> > > > > *dev)
> > > > > -     char path[16];
> > > > > - 
> > > > > -     snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%04x:%02x:%02x.%x",
> > > > > --             pci_find_domain(d->bus), d->config[PCI_SECONDARY_BUS],
> > > > > -+             pci_find_domain(d->bus), pci_bus_num(d->bus),
> > > > > -              PCI_SLOT(d->devfn), PCI_FUNC(d->devfn));
> > > > > - 
> > > > > -     return strdup(path);
> > > > > -
> > > > > -
> > > > > 
> > > > > So the chunk that fixed the part that I was actually interested in got
> > > > > dropped even though the existing code is clearly wrong.  Yes, we still
> > > > > have issues with nested bridges (not that we have many of those), but
> > > > > until the "Fix it properly later" part comes along, can we please
> > > > > include the obvious bug fix?  Thanks,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Alex
> > > > 
> > > > We can stick 0 in there - would that help?  I would much rather not
> > > > create a version where we put the bus number there.
> > > 
> > > Yep, 0 is good enough until we solve the nested bridge problem.  Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Alex
> > 
> > I'm surprised you see that it matters in practice, but ok.
> > Like this?
> 
> I've only ever seen config[PCI_SECONDARY_BUS] be non-zero for an
> assigned device, so I'm pretty sure we're not going to hurt migration,
> but the code is clearly wrong and I'd like to make sure we don't trip on
> a migration failure for a minor device config space change.

Which reminds me: maybe just mark nested bridges as non-migrateable
for now?  Care writing such a patch?

> > diff --git a/hw/pci.c b/hw/pci.c
> > index 254647b..81231c5 100644
> > --- a/hw/pci.c
> > +++ b/hw/pci.c
> > @@ -1952,7 +1952,10 @@ static char *pcibus_get_dev_path(DeviceState *dev)
> >      char path[16];
> >  
> >      snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%04x:%02x:%02x.%x",
> > -             pci_find_domain(d->bus), d->config[PCI_SECONDARY_BUS],
> > +             pci_find_domain(d->bus),
> > +             0 /* TODO: need a persistent path for nested buses.
> > +                * Note: pci_bus_num(d->bus) is not right as it's guest
> > +                * assigned. */,
> >               PCI_SLOT(d->devfn), PCI_FUNC(d->devfn));
> >  
> >      return strdup(path);
> 
> Sure, that's fine.
> 
> Acked-by: Alex Williamson <address@hidden>
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex