Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 524447] Re: virsh save is very slow

[EsbenHaabendal]

Michael Tokarev <address@hidden> writes:

> 03.01.2011 16:23, EsbenHaabendal wrote:
>> How should I interpret "Fix Released"?
>> 
>> qemu in maverick is still 0.12.5 and 0.12.3 in lucid.
>
> Not all the world is ubuntu.  In qemu (and qemu-kvm) the
> issue is fixed in 0.13, which were released quite some
> time ago.
>
>> Will this not be fixed in current stable LTS and non-LTS releases?
>
> There's no "stable LTS" and "non-LTS" releases in qemu,
> there are plain releases.

Ok.  I see.

And the current importance for libvirt (Ubuntu) and qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) is
marked as "Wishlist".

So my question goes to these two components.  When can we expect to see
this fixed in current Ubuntu releases, of which I currently count at
least maverick and lucid.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524447

Title:
  virsh save is very slow

Status in libvirt virtualization API:
  Unknown
Status in QEMU:
  Fix Released
Status in “libvirt” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in “qemu-kvm” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  As reported here: 
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-December/msg00203.html

"virsh save" is very slow - it writes the image at around 1MB/sec on my test 
system.

(I think I saw a bug report for this issue on Fedora's bugzilla, but I can't 
find it now...)

Confirmed under Karmic.