[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: IRC channel movement -> FreeNode to OFTC
From: |
François Revol |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: IRC channel movement -> FreeNode to OFTC |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jan 2011 00:22:56 +0100 |
Le 25 janv. 2011 à 23:24, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 15:05, Brian Jackson wrote:
>> On 1/24/2011 1:13 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 17:44, Brian Jackson wrote:
>>>> C. They have strange rules about groups and channel ownership
>>>
>>> ive never had a problem
>>
>> Yeah, this was a bit vague. I think the biggest issue is that nobody that's
>> actually involved in qemu currently has any ability to do anything with the
>> address@hidden So it's either make a address@hidden, try to convince
>> freenode that the current developers should have access, or move to a
>> network that is friendlier to it's users. Guess which one is easiest?
>
> so from your point, it's more a matter of "freenode sucks because
> we've lost control of the official qemu channel" and "OFTC works
> because we currently have active developers who control the official
> qemu channel". so when control is lost on OFTC, where to next ? i
> vote for EFnet.
No but it should be possible to ask the freenode team to drop the current
owners, they shall see if it's not been worked on for a while.
François.