Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?

[Yoshiaki Tamura]

2011/1/29 Anthony Liguori <address@hidden>:
> On 01/28/2011 07:33 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> On 01/28/2011 11:00 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>>
>>> 28.01.2011 11:06, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
>>> []
>>>>
>>>> I would like Kemari to be included for 0.14.  Thanks to many
>>>> valuable comments from various reviewers, it got better than
>>>> ever, I believe.  For those who may object, it wouldn't affect
>>>> any functions including live migration unless one turns it on.
>>>> Besides, it is a good application of live migration.  By having
>>>> merged, I would be able to focus on increasing functionality and
>>>> optimization.
>>>
>>> It's somewhat unexpected to see merge request for any new
>>> functionality into a "stable" branch.  Having nothing bad
>>> against Kemari, I still think we shouldn't include any new
>>> functionality into 0.14, which were planned to be released
>>> before new year... ;)
>>>
>>> I mean, if it were not merged so far, for reasons that can
>>> be discussed separately etc, regardless of its good shape
>>> and so on... let's don't do any last-minute merges.
>>
>> To be fair to Yoshiaki, the first 17 patches in his 19-patch series have
>> no impact on the operation of QEMU, and even the last two are Kemari-only.
>>  I know almost nothing about Kemari so I cannot comment on the technical
>> side of those patches, only that it w^Hshouldn't be destabilizing.  I made
>> some comments on a couple of patches, so I'm inclined to say no as well.
>
> No, I'd prefer not to take Kemari before the 0.14 freeze.  It gives us a
> full release cycle for testing plus gives a nice headline feature for 0.15.

Sounds reasonable to me. I thought it might be forgotten unless I
didn't raise my voice :) I'll keep up the pace to get it in once
the development cycle is ready.

Thanks,

Yoshi

>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/91096 should be
>> applied in any case, as it is a regression from 0.12.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
>
>
>> Paolo
>>
>
>
>