qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v3 14/22] kvm: Fix race between timer signals an


From: Jan Kiszka
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v3 14/22] kvm: Fix race between timer signals and vcpu entry under !IOTHREAD
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:27:03 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

On 2011-01-31 11:03, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 04:33 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Found by Stefan Hajnoczi: There is a race in kvm_cpu_exec between
>> checking for exit_request on vcpu entry and timer signals arriving
>> before KVM starts to catch them. Plug it by blocking both timer related
>> signals also on !CONFIG_IOTHREAD and process those via signalfd.
>>
>> As this fix depends on real signalfd support (otherwise the timer
>> signals only kick the compat helper thread, and the main thread hangs),
>> we need to detect the invalid constellation and abort configure.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka<address@hidden>
>> CC: Stefan Hajnoczi<address@hidden>
>> ---
>>
>> I don't want to invest that much into !IOTHREAD anymore, so let's see if
>> the proposed catch&abort is acceptable.
>>
> 
> I don't understand the dependency on signalfd.  The normal way of doing 
> things, either waiting for the signal in sigtimedwait() or in 
> ioctl(KVM_RUN), works with SIGALRM just fine.

And how would you be kicked out of the select() call if it is waiting
with a timeout? We only have a single thread here.

The only alternative is Stefan's original proposal. But that required
fiddling with the signal mask twice per KVM_RUN.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]