qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] correctly check ppr priority during interrupt i


From: Jan Kiszka
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] correctly check ppr priority during interrupt injection
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 10:52:37 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

On 2011-02-07 00:45, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
> 2011/2/6 Gleb Natapov <address@hidden>:
>>
>> TPR blocks all interrupts in a priority class, so simple "less or
>> equal" check is not enough.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <address@hidden>
>> diff --git a/hw/apic.c b/hw/apic.c
>> index 2f8376a..cbac75d 100644
>> --- a/hw/apic.c
>> +++ b/hw/apic.c
>> @@ -372,19 +372,33 @@ static int apic_get_arb_pri(APICState *s)
>>     return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> -/* signal the CPU if an irq is pending */
>> -static void apic_update_irq(APICState *s)
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * <0 - low prio interrupt,
>> + * 0  - no interrupt,
>> + * >0 - interrupt number
>> + */
>> +static int apic_irq_pending(APICState *s)
>>  {
>>     int irrv, ppr;
>> -    if (!(s->spurious_vec & APIC_SV_ENABLE))
>> -        return;
>>     irrv = get_highest_priority_int(s->irr);
>>     if (irrv < 0)
>> -        return;
>> +        return 0;
>>     ppr = apic_get_ppr(s);
>>     if (ppr && (irrv & 0xf0) <= (ppr & 0xf0))
>> +        return -1;
> 
> Just a minor point: braces are missing.  checkpatch.pl would
> help.

Actually, the code above does not touch lines with missing braces
(though I prefer to clean up the close environment of my patches as
well) but..

>> +
>> +    return irrv;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* signal the CPU if an irq is pending */
>> +static void apic_update_irq(APICState *s)
>> +{
>> +    if (!(s->spurious_vec & APIC_SV_ENABLE))
>>         return;

...here checkpatch would complain. Also about a trailing whitespace earlier.

Besides those minor issues, patch looks good and works fine. So you can add

Reviewed-by: Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>

on resubmission. Please also add a 0.14 tag, this is a must-have for
stable IMO.

Jan

>> -    cpu_interrupt(s->cpu_env, CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD);
>> +    if (apic_irq_pending(s) > 0) {
>> +        cpu_interrupt(s->cpu_env, CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD);
>> +    }
>>  }
>>
>>  void apic_reset_irq_delivered(void)
>> @@ -590,12 +604,13 @@ int apic_get_interrupt(DeviceState *d)
>>     if (!(s->spurious_vec & APIC_SV_ENABLE))
>>         return -1;
>>
>> -    /* XXX: spurious IRQ handling */
>> -    intno = get_highest_priority_int(s->irr);
>> -    if (intno < 0)
>> +    intno = apic_irq_pending(s);
>> +
>> +    if (intno == 0) {
>>         return -1;
>> -    if (s->tpr && intno <= s->tpr)
>> +    } else if (intno < 0) {
>>         return s->spurious_vec & 0xff;
>> +    }
>>     reset_bit(s->irr, intno);
>>     set_bit(s->isr, intno);
>>     apic_update_irq(s);
>> --
>>                        Gleb.
>>
>>

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]