qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Strategic decision: COW format


From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Strategic decision: COW format
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:50:27 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.10

On 02/18/2011 02:49 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 18.02.2011 20:47, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 02/18/2011 01:11 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
A new file format like fvd would be a challenge for the existing ones.
Declare its support as unsupported or experimental, but let users
decide which one is best suited to their needs!

Basically this is what we did for QED. In hindsight I consider it a
mistake because it set a bad precedence of inventing something new
instead of fixing what's there.
I don't see how qcow3 is fixing something that's there since it's still
an incompatible format.

It'd be a stronger argument if you were suggesting something that was
still fully compatible with qcow2 but once compatibility is broken, it's
broken.
It's really more like adding an incompatible feature flag in QED. You
still have one implementation for old and new images instead of
splitting up development efforts, you still have all of the features and
so on.

In theory. Since an implementation doesn't exist, we have no idea how much code is actually going to be shared at the end of the day.

I suspect that, especially if you drop the ref table updates, there won't be an awful lot of common code in the two paths.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

  It's a completely different story than QED.

Kevin




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]