Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Strategic decision: COW format

[Anthony Liguori]

On 02/23/2011 10:03 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/23/2011 05:50 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > > I still don't see.  What would you do with thousands of checkpoints?
> >
> >
> > For reverse debugging, if you store checkpoints at a rate of save, 
> > every 10ms, and then degrade to storing every 100ms after 1 second, 
> > etc. you'll have quite a large number of snapshots pretty quickly.  
> > The idea of snapshotting with reverse debugging is that instead of 
> > undoing every instruction, you can revert to the snapshot before, and 
> > then replay the instruction stream until you get to the desired point 
> > in time.
>
> You cannot replay the instruction stream since inputs (interrupts, 
> rdtsc or other timers, I/O) will be different.  You need Kemari for this.

Yes, I'm well aware of this.  I don't think all the pieces where ever 
really there to do this.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> > For disaster recovery, there are some workloads that you can 
> > meaningful revert to a snapshot provided that the snapshot is stored 
> > at a rate of something frequency (like once a second).  Think of 
> > something like a webserver where the only accumulated data is logs.  
> > Losing some of the logs is better than losing all of the logs.
>
> Are static webservers that interesting?  For disaster recovery? 
> Anything else will need Kemari.