Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU: Discussion of separating core functionality vs supportive features

[Jes Sorensen]

On 03/01/11 15:25, Dor Laor wrote:
> On 03/01/2011 02:40 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Spice is the logical place to start, no?  It's the largest single
>> dependency we have and it does some scary things with qemu_mutex.  I
>> would use spice as a way to prove the concept.
> 
> I agree it is desirable to the this for spice but it is allot more
> complex than virtagent isolation. Spice is performance sensitive and
> contains much more state. It needs to access the guest memory for
> reading the surfaces. It can be solved but needs some major changes.
> Adding spice-devel to the discussion.

Please don't add broken misconfigured mailing lists, which require
moderator or subscription, to discussions on public lists.

Jes