On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 04:36:34PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:03:42PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > On 2011-03-02 19:43, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 02:35:56PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > >> On 02/28/2011 04:05 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > >>> On 02/28/2011 01:13 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If there's a git tree of this I'll be happy to do an autotest run.
> > >>>
> > >>> Sure, it's branch iothread-win32 of git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git
> > >>
> > >> Fails on Fedora 9 i386 install, hangs right after "Performing post
> > >> install configuration...". The guest is processing interrupts but
> > >> the mouse won't move, and it doesn't make progress.
> > >>
> > >> Configured with --enable-io-thread. Perhaps the problem exists even
> > >> before the patchset.
> > >
> > > Probably unrelated, looks similar to the regression seen with qemu-kvm.
> > >
> >
> > Do these patches change some behavior or not?
>
> Yes, they change some behaviour. Autotest fails.
Sorry, i misunderstood. I don't think these patches change any
behaviour.
Avi's failure case is similar to what i've seen earlier upon
qemu->qemu-kvm merge. Conclusion is there is no new regression
introduced by these patches.