qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/7] ccid: add ccid-card-emulated device


From: Jes Sorensen
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/7] ccid: add ccid-card-emulated device
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:11:48 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7

On 03/14/11 17:44, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 04:41:02PM +0100, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>>> +#define MAX_ATR_SIZE 40
>>> +struct EmulatedState {
>>> +    CCIDCardState base;
>>> +    uint8_t  debug;
>>> +    char    *backend_str;
>>> +    uint32_t backend;
>>> +    char    *cert1;
>>> +    char    *cert2;
>>> +    char    *cert3;
>>> +    char    *db;
>>> +    uint8_t  atr[MAX_ATR_SIZE];
>>> +    uint8_t  atr_length;
>>> +    QSIMPLEQ_HEAD(event_list, EmulEvent) event_list;
>>> +    pthread_mutex_t event_list_mutex;
>>> +    VReader *reader;
>>> +    QSIMPLEQ_HEAD(guest_apdu_list, EmulEvent) guest_apdu_list;
>>> +    pthread_mutex_t vreader_mutex; /* and guest_apdu_list mutex */
>>> +    pthread_mutex_t handle_apdu_mutex;
>>> +    pthread_cond_t handle_apdu_cond;
>>> +    int      pipe[2];
>>> +    int      quit_apdu_thread;
>>> +    pthread_mutex_t apdu_thread_quit_mutex;
>>> +    pthread_cond_t apdu_thread_quit_cond;
>>> +};
>>
>> Bad struct packing and wrong thread types.
> Will fix.
> 
> Aside: Why do we care about packing something that has a single instance per 
> device?
> isn't logical readable order more important in this case?

We don't care too much - use your own judgement for what makes sense in
this case. I am used to spotting those so I mention them, but I didn't
actually check how often the struct was used.

Cheers,
Jes



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]